 |
The death of Christ
on the cross is the central image in Christian art and the visual focus
of Christian contemplation. The character of the image varied from one
age to another reflecting the prevailing climate of religious thought
and feeling; expressing doctrine by means of symbols and allegory, as
in medieval art; or, as in Counter-Reformation painting, serving as
a simple aid to devotion by portraying nothing but the solitary figure
on the cross; or again, narrating the gospel story in a canvas crowded
with people, as in the work of Italian Renaissance artists. The early
Church avoided the subject. At the time when Christianity was a proscribed
religion under the Romans the crucifixion was represented symbolically
by the lamb of Christ juxtaposed with a cross. Even after the age of
Constantine the Great, when Christians were allowed to practice their
religion without interference, the cross itself was still represented
without the figure of Christ. The image of the crucifixion as we know
it is first found in the 6th cent. but is rare until the Carolingian
era when representations multiplied in ivories, metalwork and manuscripts.
At this period there are regularly found those other figures from the
gospels which were to become a permanent feature of the crucifixion:
the Virgin Mary and St John the Evangelist, the centurion and the sponge-bearer,
the two thieves, the soldiers casting lots. Also seen from this time
on either side of the cross are the symbolic sun and moon and the allegorical
figures representing the Church and Synagogue; these latter features
were however to die out early in the Renaissance. For many centuries
the west, under Byzantine influence, represented Christ himself alive
and open-eyed, a triumphant Savior wearing a royal crown. In the 11th
cent. there appeared a new type, the emaciated figure with its head
fallen on one shoulder and, later, wearing the crown of thorns. This
version prevailed in western art thereafter.
Some features of the crucifixion bear closely on aspects of Christian
doctrine. By sacrificing himself on the cross Christ brought about the
possibility of man's redemption, that is to say his delivery from the
original sin of Adam which all mankind inherited. Medieval writers set
out therefore to establish 'historical' links between the Fall and the
crucifixion, maintaining for example that the cross was made from the
very wood of the Tree of Knowledge in the Garden of Eden (or from one
that grew from its seed), and that Adam's burial place was at the site
of- the crucifixion. The skull commonly seen at the foot of the cross
alludes therefore not merely to Golgotha, 'the place of the skull',
but represents Adam's own skull. Furthermore, the blood of Christ, shed
on the cross, was early understood to have redemptive powers, a concept
embodied in the sacrament of Communion. Hence it became customary to
represent the stream of blood that issued from the wound in Christ's
side being caught in a chalice, the Eucharistic vessel. In these and
other ways the image of the crucifixion served as a reminder of Christian
teaching.
The following sections describe the more important figures that are
seen beside the cross. The subject as a whole lends itself to symmetrical
treatment, and there is a marked tendency towards the use of figures
in pairs, one balanced against the other on either side of the cross,
for example the Virgin and St John. Note also the moral distinction
between the right and left sides: good on the right of the Savior, evil
on his left, as in the positioning of the penitent and impenitent thieves
(2), or the two women who symbolize Church and Synagogue (12).
-
The
cross and the figure of Christ. (a) The cross. In Roman times crucifixion
was a widely used form of capital punishment, reserved for baser criminals
and slaves. It was probably carried out in a manner rather different
from the one to which art has accustomed us. At the site of the execution
the upright post (stipes) was already set into the ground, a fixture
that could be used more than once. The condemned man was led to the
place bearing only the horizontal piece (partibulum) to which his
hands were already tied to prevent resistance. On arrival his hands
(or wrists) were nailed to the ends of the cross-bar which was then
lifted on to the upright. It either rested across the top, to form
a 'T', called the tau-cross (from the Greek letter 't') or crux commissa
(joined); or was set somewhat lower down, forming the familiar crux
immissa (intersecting). In either case the pieces were secured by
some form of mortise and tenon. Finally the feet were nailed to the
upright. The foot-rest, or suppendaneum was an invention of medieval
artists. Though it is customary for the two thieves to be shown tied
to the cross, nailing was probably universal. In art up to the 13th
cent. the usual number of nails was four (including one for each foot),
thereafter with few exceptions it was three, (one foot nailed over
the other). The only reference to Christ's nails in the gospels is
made by doubting Thomas (John 20:25). Nails as holy relics number
well over twenty. In antiquity an inscription (or titulus) stating
the nature of the condemned man's offence was hung round his neck
as he was led to execution, and was afterwards fixed to the head of
the cross. John (19:19-20) tells how Pilate 'wrote an inscription
to be fastened to the cross; it read, "Jesus of Nazareth King of the
Jews".. in Hebrew, Latin and Greek.' In Renaissance art it is usually
given in Latin only, 'lesus Nazarenus Rex ludaeorum', abbreviated
to 'INRI'; it may be seen in full, in three languages, in counter-Reformation
painting. In the 13th cent. the cross sometimes assumes the shape
of a living tree (lignum vitae), a form that occasionally recurs in
later periods. This was the Tree of Knowledge, brought to life again,
according to Bonaventura, from whose writings the motif is derived,
by the power of the Redeemer's blood, another manner of expressing
the relationship between the Fall and the crucifixion. (b) The figure
of Christ. As we have seen, artists of the Renaissance and later depicted
Christ dead upon the cross. His head inclines on his shoulder, generally
to the right. (John, 19:30, states that he 'bowed his head' at the
moment of death.) The crown of thorns became widely depicted from
the mid-13th cent. when Louis IX, king of France, returned from a
crusade to the Near East bringing the holy relic with him. Until the
Counter-Reformation it is seldom omitted. The medieval Church debated
whether Christ would have been naked on the cross, though the condemned
in Roman times generally were. In the very earliest examples he wears,
in the east, a long sleeveless garment; elsewhere he has a thin band
of cloth extending round the waist and under the crotch, the subligaculum.
Either could be correct historically. There is however no sanction
for the familiar loincloth, or perizonium, an invention of artists
in the early middle ages. See below concerning the wound in Christ's
side.
Persons round the Cross
-
The two thieves. All four gospels relate that two thieves ('bandits'
or 'criminals' in the New English Bible) were crucified with Christ,
one on each side. Luke adds that one rebuked the other saying that
their punishment was deserved whereas Christ was innocent, and was
told by the Savior, 'Today you shall be with me in Paradise.' (In
fulfillment of this promise, he was among those rescued by Christ
in the Descent into Limbo.) Art, following Luke, distinguished between
the penitent and impenitent thief. The good is on Christ's right (the
'good' side); his expression is composed and peaceful where the other's
is anguished. The soul of the good is borne away by angels; that of
the bad by demons. The Byzantine painters' guide states, 'the thief
to the right, a gray-haired man with round beard; he to the left,
young and beardless,' but this is by no means always followed in the
west. The early Italian Renaissance tended to follow the Byzantine
practice of depicting the thieves, like Christ, nailed to their crosses
though, conforming to the medieval custom of relating size to sanctity,
they were made smaller than the Savior. But in order to differentiate
clearly between him and them it became general in the west to show
the thieves bound, not nailed. Moreover their crosses, unlike Christ's,
became the T-shaped crux commissar from the cross-bar of which they
hung by the armpits. They are occasionally blindfold. John tells how
the soldiers broke the legs of the thieves to hasten their death.
They may be seen in the act of so doing; or the thieves are shown
bleeding from leg wounds, motifs found principally in 15th cent. German
painting. The names by which they are most generally known, Dismas
and Gestas (good and bad), are taken from the apocryphal Gospel of
Nicodemus.
- The lance-bearer
and sponge-bearer. 'When they came to Jesus, they found that he was
already dead... One of the soldiers stabbed his side with a lance, and
at once there was a flow of blood and water.' (John 19:34). Much legend
and speculation surrounded the soldier. He was named Longinus (from
the Greek word for a lance) and came to be identified with the centurion
in the synoptic gospels (not mentioned by John) who exclaimed, 'Truly
this man was a son of God.' The Golden Legend tells that Longinus was
cured of blindness by the blood from the wound and was later baptized
and martyred. He was canonized . Artists often keep the identities separate,
showing both a soldier piercing the side of Christ, and a centurion
in armor, perhaps on horseback, with an expression of wonder on his
face. The lance-bearer's blindness may be indicated by a bystander guiding
his hand. All four gospels mentioned that a sponge soaked in wine and
fixed to the end of a cane was offered to Christ just before he died.
Legend gave the sponge-bearer the name of Stephaton and medieval art
regularly paired him with Longinus. The two, standing symmetrically
on either side of the cross and holding up their slender wands, symbolized
the Church and the Synagogue, Longinus on the right standing for the
Church (see also section 12). The sponge-bearer becomes somewhat rare
in Renaissance art but the sponge itself may often be seen upraised
among the soldiers' weapons.
- The soldiers casting
lots. This theme occurs fairly often in all periods of Christian art.
John's account (19:2324) is the fullest and the one generally followed.
Having crucified Christ the soldiers divided his clothes into four parts
,one for each soldier.' Of the seamless tunic, woven in one piece, they
said, 'We must not tear this; let us toss for it.' They are seen either
at the foot of the cross or in a corner of the picture. One is in the
act of throwing dice while the others look on. Alternatively they are
quarrelling together, one with a drawn knife with which he is about
to cut the garment, while another tries to mediate. The number of soldiers
varies and may be only three.
- The Virgin and
St John standing by the cross. This very common scene from the crucifixion
was originally intended to express in visual terms the passage from
John's gospel (19:2627) in which Christ, while he still lived, entrusted
the Virgin to the care of the apostle John: 'Jesus saw his mother, with
the disciple whom he loved standing beside her. He said to her, "Mother,
there is your son"; and to the disciple, "There is your mother"; and
from that moment the disciple took her into his home.' The pattern became
established in the 9th cent. in the art of the Carolingian Renaissance.
The Virgin stands on the right of Christ, St John on the left. Their
heads are inclined. She may have raised her left hand to her cheek,
supporting the elbow with the other hand, a traditional gesture of sorrow
that dates back to Hellenistic times. Christ is alive, in conformity
with the gospel account and with the prevailing artistic convention.
Later, as the living, triumphant figure on the cross gives way to the
dead Christ with the wound in his side, so the two figures below manifest
grief in a more naturalistic manner, and the strict sense of the gospel
is lost. In the 15th cent. the theme tended to be overtaken by that
of the Virgin swooning (see next section).
- The Virgin swooning;
the holy women. There is no biblical sanction for this incident, beloved
by Renaissance artists. It is a creation of later medieval monastic
preachers and mystical writers. In dwelling on the sorrows of the Virgin
it was natural for them to assume that she was overcome with anguish
by the events of the Passion. It was told that she swooned three times:
on the Road to Calvary, at the crucifixion and after the descent from
the cross. The change from the upright, stoically grieving figure of
medieval art came about gradually. In earlier examples she is still
on her feet but supported in the arms of the holy women or St John;
in the 15th cent. she has collapsed to the ground. The motif was explicitly
condemned by the Council of Trent who directed artists to John's words
(19:25): 'Near the cross... stood his mother.' It is consequently rarely
seen after the second half of the 16th cent. The holy women, the companions
of the Virgin, are mentioned by all the evangelists but the varying
descriptions are difficult to reconcile. Mary whom John calls the wife
of Clopas was said to be the same as Mary whom Matthew and Mark call
the mother of James and Joseph. Similarly, Salome, mentioned by Mark,
was regarded as the same person as the 'mother of Zebedee's children'
in Matthew. These two, together with Mary Magdalene, are commonly known
as the Three Maries. In art their numbers vary, but they are generally
three or four. Their appearance is not clearly differentiated except
for Mary Magdalene who, in early Renaissance art, wears red.
- Mary Magdalene.
It was not until the Renaissance that Mary of Magdala came to be distinguished
from the other holy women. As mentioned above, in early works she may
sometimes be recognized by her red cloak among those supporting the
swooning Virgin, but her typical role throughout Renaissance and Counter-Reformation
art shows her as a separate figure, often richly attired and with her
usual copious hair, kneeling at the foot of the cross or embracing it
in passionate grief. She may kiss the bleeding feet or wipe them with
her hair, thus turning the earlier episode in the house of Simon the
Pharisee into a prefigurative act. She is even seen catching the drops
of blood in her mouth, another reminder of the Eucharist.
- Saints and donors.
From about the mid-15th cent. may be found a form of the crucifixion
in which saints, regardless of the age in which they lived, are assembled
together before the cross, in much the same manner as in the Sacra Conversazione
which came into being at about this time. It is a devotional treatment
of the subject found principally in Italian art. The saints, who can
be recognized by their customary attributes, may be the patrons of the
city or church, or founders of the Order, for which the work was commissioned;
by virtue of this Francis of Assisi, Dominic, Augustine (with Monica)
are often to be seen. Jerome and Catherine of Alexandria, perhaps as
patrons of learning, are equally common. Sebastian and Roch, protectors
against the plague, often accompany a kneeling donor, signifying that
the work is a votive offering to the church in thanksgiving for the
donor's escape from sickness. John the Baptist may be present either
as one of the tutelary saints or for his place in the scheme of Christian
belief as the prophet of Christ's divinity and the redemptive sacrifice.
('There is the Lamb of God, it is he who takes away the sins of the
world.') The Virgin and St John the apostle are nearly always to be
seen standing behind. Symbols and Allegorical Figures
- The skull and the
serpent. Adam's relevance to the crucifixion through the doctrine of
the Redemption and hence the appearance of his skull at the foot of
the cross has been mentioned above. It is first seen in the 9th cent.
and recurs thereafter throughout Christian art. The skull is frequently
sprinkled with the blood that drips from the Savior's body. This symbolic
washing away of Adam's sin is particularly a feature of the art of the
Counter-Reformation. At the same period the skull may be depicted upside
down, as it were a chalice, in which the blood is caught. A serpent
with an apple in its mouth, near the skull, is a further allusion to
the Fall.
- The wound and the
chalice. The special significance attaching to the wound in Christ's
side and much of the symbolism surrounding it is due first to St Augustine.
The 'blood and water' which, according to John, issued from the wound
was conceived by him to represent the Eucharist and Baptism. Just as
Eve was fashioned from the rib taken from Adam's side, so the two main
Christian sacraments flowed from the side of Christ, the 'New Adam';
thus the Church, the 'Bride of the Lord', was born, as it were, from
the wound. In the later Middle Ages the figure of Adam, perhaps emerging
from the tomb, is seen below the cross, holding a chalice in which he
catches the redeeming blood. From the 14th cent. one or more angels,
each bearing a chalice, are similarly engaged floating beside the cross,
one at each wound. A chalice sometimes stands at the foot of the cross
as a reminder of the theme. The wound is generally on the right side
of the body, the 'good' side, and, once more according to Augustine,
the side of 'eternal life'. By the early 17th cent. this symbolism was
forgotten and the wound is found on either side.
- Sun and moon. The
sun and moon, one on each side of the cross, are a regular feature of
medieval crucifixions. They survived into the early Renaissance but
are seldom seen after the 15th cent. Their origin is very ancient. It
was the custom to represent the sun and moon in images of the pagan
sun gods of Persia and Greece, a practice that was carried over into
Roman times on coins depicting the emperors. It seems to have found
its way into primitive Christian art through the festival of Christmas
which took over an existing pagan feast celebrating the rebirth of the
sun. Long before the first representations of the crucifixion the sun
and moon appeared in other Christian themes: the Baptism, the Good Shepherd,
Christ in Majesty. When art began to depict Christ on the cross their
appropriateness to the theme was seen to be already established in the
Bible and by theologians. The synoptic gospels relate that from midday
a darkness fell over the whole land, which lasted until three in the
afternoon. The eclipse might be simply a sign that the heavens went
into mourning at the death of the Savior; but more specifically, according
to Augustine, the sun and moon symbolized the prefigurative relationship
of the two Testaments: the Old (the moon) was only to be understood
by the light shed upon it by the New (the sun): The typology of the
Old Testament.) In medieval examples the sun and moon may be represented
in their classical forms: the sun as a male figure driving a quadriga,
the moon as a female driving a team of oxen, each within a circular
disk. (Cf. Apollo: The Sun god.) Or the sun is simply a man's bust with
a radiant halo, the moon a woman's with the crescent of Diana. Later
they are reduced to two plain disks, the moon having a crescent within
the circle, and may be borne by angels. The sun appears on Christ's
right, the moon on his left.
- Church and Synagogue.
The two allegorical figures seen on either side of the cross and standing
for the Church and the Synagogue belong strictly to the Middle Ages
and are included here as another example of the 'moral symmetry' of
the crucifixion. Matthew (27:51) tells how, at the moment of Christ's
death, 'the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom.'
This, in the eyes of Christian commentators, marked the end of the Old
Law and the beginning of the reign of the New - the triumph of the Church
over the Synagogue. They are portrayed as fully draped female figures.
The Church, on the right of the cross, is crowned and holds a chalice
in which she catches the Redeemer's blood. The Synagogue, on the left,
is blindfold, and her crown falls from her inclined head. The tables
of the Law may likewise fall from her hands. The figures first became
widespread in the Carolingian Renaissance and are to be found later
in the sculpture and stained glass of cathedrals of the 12th and 13th
cents.
- Pelican. Legend
tells how the pelican feeds its young with blood by piercing its breast
with its beak. The earliest bestiary, by the anonymous Physiologus,
says that the hen smothers her young by her excess of love but the male
bird, returning, restores them to life by piercing its side and shedding
its blood over them. The image was used as a symbol of Charity in the
Renaissance, but just as aptly fitted the concept of the shedding of
Christ's blood to redeem mankind. Dante (Paradiso 25: 112) refers to
the apostle John as 'he who leant upon the breast of Christ our Pelican.'
The bird is sometimes to be seen perched, or nesting with its young,
on the top of the cross.
James Hall, Dictionary
of Subjects and Symbols in Art, New York: Harper & Row, rev. ed. 1979
|